Normal deduction in the intuitionistic linear logic

نویسنده

  • Grigori Mints
چکیده

A natural deduction system NDIL described here admits normalization and has subformula property. It has standard axioms A ` A, ` 1, standard introduction and elimination rules for &,−◦ (linear implication), ⊕ and quantifiers. The rules for ⊗ are now standard too. Structural rules are (implicit) permutation plus contraction and weakening for m-formulas. The rules for ! use an idea of D. Prawitz. By a m-formula we mean 1, any formula beginning with !, and any expression < Γ >!A, where Γ is a list of formulas and m-formulas, and A is a formula. Derivable objects are sequents Γ ` A where Γ is a multiset of formulas and m-formulas, and A is a formula. The rules for !, weakening and contraction are as follows: <> I Γ `!A < Γ >!A`!A !E Γ `!A Γ ` A !I Γ ` A Γ `!A <> E < Γ >!B, Σ ` A Γ, Σ ` A weak Γ ` A Σ ` B Γ, Σ ` B c B,B, Γ ` D B, Γ ` D provided Γ consists of m-formulas, B is a m-formula and A is 1 or begins with ! . Normal deduction is one without maximal segments. Theorem. Every derivable sequent has a normal deduction. Proof. Apply Prawitz translation to a cut-free sequent derivation

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Relating Natural Deduction and Sequent Calculus for Intuitionistic Non-Commutative Linear Logic

We present a sequent calculus for intuitionistic non-commutative linear logic (INCLL), show that it satisfies cut elimination, and investigate its relationship to a natural deduction system for the logic. We show how normal natural deductions correspond to cut-free derivations, and arbitrary natural deductions to sequent derivations with cut. This gives us a syntactic proof of normalization for...

متن کامل

Natural Deduction for Intuitionistic Non-communicative Linear Logic

We present a system of natural deduction and associated term calculus for intuitionistic non-commutative linear logic (INCLL) as a conservative extension of intuitionistic linear logic. We prove subject reduction and the existence of canonical forms in the implicational fragment.

متن کامل

Proof Nets for Intuitionistic Logic

Until the beginning of the 20th century, there was no way to reason formally about proofs. In particular, the question of proof equivalence had never been explored. When Hilbert asked in 1920 for an answer to this very question in his famous program, people started looking for proof formalizations. Natural deduction and sequent calculi, which were invented by Gentzen in 1935, quickly became two...

متن کامل

Natural Deduction for Intuitionistic Non-Commutative Linear Logic

We present a system of natural deduction and associated term calculus for intuitionistic non-commutative linear logic (INCLL) as a conservative extension of intuitionistic linear logic. We prove subject reduction and the existence of canonical forms in the implicational fragment. We also illustrate by means of an example how the proof term calculus can be employed in the setting of logical fram...

متن کامل

A Parigot-style Linear Λ-calculus for Full Intuitionistic Linear Logic

This paper describes a natural deduction formulation for Full Intuitionistic Linear Logic (FILL), an intriguing variation of multiplicative linear logic, due to Hyland and de Paiva. The system FILL resembles intuitionistic logic, in that all its connectives are independent, but resembles classical logic in that its sequent-calculus formulation has intrinsic multiple conclusions. From the intrin...

متن کامل

in ri a - 00 28 16 31 , v er si on 1 - 2 4 M ay 2 00 8 Focusing in linear meta - logic : extended report

It is well known how to use an intuitionistic meta-logic to specify natural deduction systems. It is also possible to use linear logic as a meta-logic for the specification of a variety of sequent calculus proof systems. Here, we show that if we adopt different focusing annotations for such linear logic specifications, a range of other proof systems can also be specified. In particular, we show...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Arch. Math. Log.

دوره 37  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1998